Agent speed · Every PR senior-reviewed
Ship the roadmap you can't hire for.
I run fleets of Claude Code agents to clear your backlog fast — then I adversarially review every pull request myself, because I've caught the shell-injection bugs the agents wrote that the tests passed clean.
Your roadmap ships — without a security incident on your name.
2-3x, not 100x — and here's what the agents get wrong.
If the first reviewed PR isn't merge-ready to your standard, you don't pay for it.
reviewed PRs · 9 agent batches · 2.5 days
shell-injection vulnerabilities caught — that passed the tests
in production: Ipsos → PGL Esports → GoSocial → Bono Fintech
These are from a benchmark I ran end-to-end on my own repo — the PRs, the review notes, and the caught vulnerabilities are all real and documented, not a paying-client engagement (those case studies are in progress). Want the same review on your code? Send me a repo for a free teardown →
Not ready to book?
Get the Agent PR Review Checklist — the checks that catch bugs the tests pass clean. Plus an occasional email on shipping AI-written code safely — unsubscribe anytime.
You have the backlog. You don't have the headcount. And you've seen what unsupervised agents ship.
You're months behind on a roadmap you can't hire your way out of fast enough. The AI-agent pitch is tempting — everyone's promising 10x, 100x, a team-in-a-box. But you've read the code agents write. You know it goes green on tests and still carries a confident vulnerability into your payment flow. And you're the name on the incident report if it does.
Speed without review isn't velocity. It's a liability with a shorter fuse.
The whole thing is two steps. Most vendors only sell you the first.
The agents write the volume
Fleets of Claude Code agents run in parallel git worktrees, each dispatched a ticket and driven by your CLAUDE.md conventions. This is where the 2-3x comes from: a small team's throughput from one operator and a harness.
A senior human reviews every PR
Every agent PR goes through a line-by-line adversarial review before it reaches you. Security first — injection, auth, secrets, access control — then correctness and scope. The assumption is the agent got it wrong until it's proven right. This is the part that's rare, and accountable.
Speed you can buy anywhere now. The verify layer is the part that's rare — and the part that's accountable.
Three ways to work together.
Agents ship the volume, a senior engineer reviews every PR — packaged three ways. Every engagement is fixed-scope and priced before we start.
Agent-Accelerated Delivery Sprint, Reviewed
A fixed batch of production-ready PRs, each one adversarially reviewed for security, shipped in days at a price you agree before we start.
Sprints from €7,500 — most €12–18k, fixed on the call.
Learn more →AI-Native Delivery Retainer, Reviewed
A steady flow of security-reviewed PRs every month — agent-speed delivery that runs continuously, not in bursts, with the review layer never dropped.
Learn more →Set Up Your Agent Harness
I install and harden the exact ship/verify harness I run — in your repo, tuned to your stack — so your own team can ship at agent speed with the guardrails already in place.
Learn more →The verify layer is one senior human and doesn't parallelize — so only a few engagements run at once.
30 reviewed PRs in 2.5 days — and the 3 vulnerabilities that almost shipped.
This wasn't a client engagement — it was my own admin dashboard, run end-to-end to stress-test the method. Nine agent batches ran a real backlog through the harness in parallel. The agents produced 30 PRs. The tests passed. The adversarial review still caught 3 shell-injection vulnerabilities before any of them merged. That's what the honest 2-3x actually looks like — including what the agents got wrong.
If the first reviewed PR isn't merge-ready to your standard, you don't pay for it.
Ship the roadmap you can't hire for — reviewed before it reaches you.
Two ways in, both without a commitment. See the work on your own code first, or scope a sprint directly.
Free code teardown
Send a repo or a recent PR. Get a 15-minute Loom of the security bugs your AI coding tools wrote that pass tests and merge anyway. No pitch.
Book a scoping call
Know you want your backlog shipped this way? Book 30 minutes and we'll fix the scope and the price before anything starts.
Somewhere in between? Start with one Reviewed PR — €1,000, ~48h, credited toward a sprint →
Built for a specific buyer. Wrong for a few others.
This is for you if
- +You lead engineering, found a company, or own delivery at a funded startup or scaleup — especially where a security review is non-negotiable: fintech, health, payments, anything handling money or PII.
- +You're drowning in backlog and can't hire your way out fast enough.
- +You want agent-speed throughput but need a senior human accountable for what merges.
- +You'd rather hear the real multiplier than the flattering one.
This isn't for you if
- −You're shopping purely on hourly rate. The review layer is the value you'd be pricing out.
- −You want to hear "100x" and don't care who reviews the code.
- −You need a staff-aug seat with a badge and standups. This is outcome delivery, not headcount.
- −You're pre-idea with no scope to fix a price against.
2-3x, not 100x — and here's what the agents get wrong.
Bring me a backlog. I'll ship it at agent speed and review every PR for security before it reaches you.
You triage and merge. I'm accountable for what lands.
The verify layer is one senior human and doesn't parallelize — so only a few sprints run at once. When the slots are full, new engagements join a dated waitlist.